Technology in Evangelism - Joey Ferrell (FSOP Lectureship)

*** The following is a manuscript from The 2026 Florida School of Preaching Lectureship.  This lesson and many more can be found at the FSOP YouTube page or www.fsop.net webpage.

Technology in Evangelism

Joey Ferrell

It was 5:58 p.m. on Christmas Day 2004 in Golden, Colorado, when the first seismic

waves arrived from halfway around the world. A massive magnitude 9.1 earthquake that

had just struck off the coast of Sumatra at 7:58 a.m. local time sent vibrations racing

through the Earth’s crust at several kilometers per second, eventually reaching the

sensors that track global seismicity at the USGS [United States Geological Survey]

National Earthquake Information Center.


Inside the building nestled in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, the skeleton crew

working the holiday shift noticed something dramatic. Their computer screens were

lighting up with incoming data from seismic stations across the globe. What first

appeared as subtle squiggles quickly grew into dramatic spikes as the primary waves

arrived, followed by even larger secondary waves. (Koehler)

Someone might ask how this story relates to evangelism, and more specifically, how it

relates to technology usage in evangelism. The answer lies not within just the spectrum of this

particular part of the article, but with the tragic aftermath that continued to be reported. The

United States Geologic Survey (USGS) article continues with these heart-wrenching details

about that overly-active night of tragedy in 2004.


The most haunting moment came when they realized the danger for the Indian Ocean

region. Their scientific training told them that an earthquake this large, in that location,

would have displaced an enormous amount of water. Tsunami waves were likely already

racing across the ocean at jet-plane speeds.


The team knew that every minute counted. They began reaching out to their international

contacts and tsunami warning centers, though at the time there was no comprehensive

warning system in the Indian Ocean that could disseminate warnings to the public.

As the scientists worked through the night, reports began trickling in from the region.

The first news of devastating tsunami waves hitting coastlines confirmed their worst

fears. The earthquake they had measured from their computers in Colorado was

unleashing one of the deadliest disasters in recorded history.


The scope of loss became incomprehensible. Entire communities vanished. Villages that

had stood for centuries disappeared. The tsunami claimed more lives in a few hours than

any other natural disaster of the 21st century.

Indonesia: Over 167,000 fatalities

Sri Lanka: More than 35,000 fatalities

India: Around 18,000 fatalities

Thailand: Over 8,000 fatalities

And thousands more across other affected nations. (Koehler)


A difficult and record-breaking disaster taking hundreds of thousands of lives and

changing the dynamics and geography of many landscapes for what may seem like an eternity is

extremely hard to read, discuss, and comprehend. More importantly, however, is the fate of an

even greater number of lives—not physical lives, but spiritual lives, the souls which may die in a

lost condition or souls who do not remain faithful to our Lord.

In the Book of Ezekiel, God charged the prophet with being a “watchman” of His people.

The charge of being a watchman was clearly denoted in Ezekiel 3:16-21; 33:7-10. This role of

becoming a watchman had serious implications not only to the people being watched (i.e., the

children of Israel), but also to the person watching. This seriousness is seen in the language God

used:

When I say to the wicked, “You shall surely die,” and you give him no warning, norspeak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked manshall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. 19Yet, if you warn thewicked, and he does not turn from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you have delivered your soul.
— (Ezk. 3:18-19, NKJ)


The children of Israel should have known the laws, the punishment for disobeying them,

as well as the ultimate reward for compliance. However, God used Ezekiel in that process of

maintaining the understanding of what he, and the people should have known from God’s own

edicts. What about the Gentiles in the New Testament age? How would they know what God

expected of them for their own souls to be saved? How would the Jews, who no longer had the

former covenant in place, know what they must do to become a Christian?

The simple answer is somewhat complex, yet it maintains its simplicity through one word

that is not found in any Bible translation today. That word is evangelism. Evangelism is a word

that can be traced back to the same Greek word translated “angel,” or “messenger.” An angel, or

messenger, in this context would be someone who heralds the good news of the gospel. Today,

many will use this word to describe a preacher, sometimes called an evangelist. In part, this is

true. After all, the apostle Paul declared, “How then shall they call on Him in whom they have

not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall

they hear without a preacher?” (Rom. 10:14-15).

In this lesson, the dynamics of evangelism are going to be tested not in the first century

context but in the twenty-first century. The reality is that evangelism, as well as preaching the

word, has continued to change drastically in methodology throughout those many years since

Paul penned those very words. It is the responsibility of the church to proclaim that message

being preached (1 Cor. 1; Rom. 10, Gal. 1).

Technology As An Expedient

What is the the best way to evangelize or preach the word today? We must preach the

truth! How do we do that? Expediently. Who is to do that? The charge and command goes out to

every Christian (cf. Mt. 28:18-20; Mk. 16:15-16). What method is most successful? That is not

an easy answer because it differs in certain situations. However, in this discussion, we will focus

on the weight of technology in evangelism today and how the future will continue to shape the

way lost souls can be brought unto the saving message of Jesus.

The first task is to show that technology in evangelism is not only practical, but it is

biblical as long as it is used expediently (cf. 1 Cor. 10:23). When God commissioned Noah to

build the ark to save himself and his family, He gave him a blueprint with dimensions, material

specifications, and qualifications. In order for that boat to float, Noah had to stick to the basics of

what God told him. What God did not tell Noah was how to acquire the wood, how to measure

the size, how to cut the wood, and how to form it so the boat would float. History does not reveal

that there had been any type of a vessel built like that before. Did God have to spell out every

single action for Noah? Certainly not. There were expedients. Did Noah use a hammer he bought

at the hardware store? Well, or course not, he would have had to devise a way to work with what

he had, what God had given to him to use, and a lot of trial and error. No wonder it took so many

years to build what can be built in a fraction of the time today with our technology. Technology

is not the outcome. It is an expedient tool that never changed the overall outcome. This principle

of using tools can be found all throughout the pages of our printed Bibles, which ironically, are

available today because of technology! Imagine if God’s word was completely written on tablets

of stone that were carved by hand!

Innovation is seen throughout the Bible as displayed by God’s prophets and in the New

Testament, by the apostles as they traveled with Jesus and went on yet another product of

technology; namely, roads. Roman roads are some of the longest lasting roads built in the world.

Paul would later use shipping routes, primitive mail systems, and even written laws to help

spread the gospel as rapidly as possible. John wrote to Gaius, “had many things to write, but I do

not wish to write to you with pen and ink” (3 Jn. 13). What is “pen and ink”? In this case, it is

technology. No longer were things recorded on tablets of stone, but on scrolls and codices using

ink and papyrus. God certainly authorized His people to use these tools by the examples He gave

us.

So, what about our century? What tools can be used today to evangelize and make the

kingdom stronger? With the pattern we have seen in the early church, as well as the patriarchal

usage of technology, it would be feasible to say that any tool that God has given us to utilize, if

used in the proper manner, would be an effective and profitable means to further the teaching of

the gospel.

“But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be

witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth” (Acts

1:8). The apostles were given this declaration straight from our Lord. The miraculous power

coming through the Holy Spirit will be seen on the day of Pentecost through the apostles’

preaching at the beginning of Christ’s church (Acts 2:1-47). Throughout the next few chapters of

Acts, this plan starts to be put into action with the spreading of the gospel. Christians set out on

foot and by boat proclaiming that gospel to “all the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8). Is that still

possible to accomplish today? If the apostles and the followers of Jesus could do it in a world

that was without our “advanced” technology, taking days, weeks, months, and years to travel to

meet those who had not heard, how much better is it today with the ability to send a message,

make a phone call, or publish a plea to any and all across not just a town, not just a state, not just

a country, but around the world? This is amazing to even consider.

Technology’s Value

With this in mind, research has shown that technology has a very vital and growing role

in evangelism. The form of technology has changed, but the principle remains constant and

continues to grow. Whether some technology actually improves or detracts is another topic.

However, to deny that technology has aided in communication would be dishonest. In 2019,

Clement reported that the following questions were some of the most popular questions

surrounding religion in the world on search engines: “Is God real? What happens when we die?

How do I know I’m saved? Why is there so much suffering in the world?” Along with these

questions, it was also reported that “77% of Americans are on social media” (Clement).

With those types of questions and statistics from almost seven years ago, it is hard to say

that technology does not play a very vital role in communication with others about God and the

gospel. Another survey from over two decades ago reported:

Digital discipleship and evangelism are ways to activate the social influence of a church

membership, building bridges to the local community, developing a meaningful

understanding of felt needs, and determining relevant ways to serve the community (both

in and outside the church). It’s also a strategy to scale up friendship evangelism and

empower individuals to be actively involved in the larger goals and mission of your

church. However, millennials can spend up to 18 hours a day consuming media in the

form of movies, podcasts, social media, video games, reading, etc. (McCarthy and

Richter)

Imagine how those statements and statistics have changed in the past two decades with an

entirely new generation of young adults moving into the digital world. The current social media

platforms now have record numbers of users growing daily as well as new platforms being born

as time continues. Artificial Intelligence, or AI, seems to have taken on its unfair share of space

in the cyber world today as well. Each day brings something new and exciting in the digital

world. Some platforms succeed and are seemingly like magnets to the next generation, while

even our older generations find some platforms to be their electronic “fix.” The online world has

become an eclectic host of personalities, including those who do not want to communicate in

person, or face-to-face (i.e., introverts).

Caution To Churches

The church must be extremely careful, however, as the positives of technology can

quickly turn a page and become negative, turning away people who are searching for the truth.

“Digital evangelism, using technology to spread the message of faith, has become increasingly

prevalent today. While some see it as a valuable tool for reaching a wider audience, others view

it as a dilution of traditional religious practices” (Opade, 15). The ramifications of content being

instant, even in the spiritual realm, complicate learning what is truth, as oposed to what may be

an alternate ideology. With the fast-paced growth of AI (Artificial Intelligence), computers are

generating real-time answers to any question asked, drawing images that are skewed in their

nature, and even producing video content, even from those who have been deceased for a much

longer time than computers have existed! How do we determine when and how much data to

trust in our digital evangelism efforts? That is the question that will be strongly asked for many

years to come, evidenced by the host of fake content seen recently. No story can be verified

easily. Pictures can be distorted to a point that every detail can be questioned. The same will

apply to how people will conduct efforts through technology, as well as how people will learn the

answers to their own spiritual questions. Thus, extreme caution must be utilized in the usage and

adherence of these technological tools.

Opade continues in this same article stating what is already evident, even this very

lectureship, when we use technology to record and distribute these lessons through electronic

means.

It has opened up new opportunities for evangelism, allowing religious organisations to

reach a wider audience, engage with individuals in new and innovative ways, and adapt

to their followers’ changing needs and preferences. Technology has also allowed

religious organisations to reach a global audience, breaking down geographical barriers

and creating opportunities for cross-cultural communication. Technology has allowed all

of us to become domestic and foreign missionaries. (16)

While being stewards of this new method of spreading the gospel, balance must be kept (in local

work and on foreign soil) in order to maintain the integrity of the message. Consideration needs

to be given to the potential that technology can have negative influences on the church, causing it

to become a commercial footprint in a world of already confusing religious beliefs. Opade

stresses concern about the real possibility of becoming impersonal and losing community, or

local church fellowship. When people “join the assembly online” or benevolent needs are

distributed elecetronically from afar, we lose personal involvement with one another.

Another one of the fiercest challenges Opade identifies can be the engagement of false

ideologies through the digital format.

Furthermore, there are concerns about the quality of religious education provided

through digital platforms, with some arguing that it is impossible to convey the same

level of depth and understanding through a digital medium. Others argue that digital

evangelism promotes a consumerist approach to religion, where individuals choose

religious content according to their preferences rather than engaging in a holistic

approach to faith … Digital evangelism raises concerns about the spread of

misinformation and disinformation. (20)

“Virtual worship” falls into this same category when thinking about the shift from

community and personal involvement. Many people who have not been able to physically attend

services have an entire new platform in which they can interact. However, when the physical

need of some people turns into a convenience to other people, worship for some loses or at least

lessens much of its God-given purpose (cf. Jn. 4:23-24; Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16). The virtual

platform cannot become a replacement for the worship described in the Bible. Christians cannot

“meet together” to partake of the Lord’s Supper “online.” Christians can participate in their own

breaking of bread. However, watching from a screen is not the same as sitting with brothers and

sisters in Christ to “proclaim the Lord’s death till He comes” (1 Cor. 11:26). Singing along with

the video is a good opportunity, once again, for those who are impaired from being at the

assembly of the saints. However, this too falls short of “teaching one another in psalms, hymns,

and spiritual songs” (Col. 3:16). While online streaming, or archiving of worship services, can be

a good resource for those who are not able to attend, caution should be used with this platform,

not only as a member of the body, but especially from the perspective of the local church’s

eldership. Can a person place membership with a congregation if he or she has only “attended”

online? Some might say yes, but while there is no biblical precedent to say that it is not possible,

it would seem to be an extreme reach to say a people can be members of a congregation with

whom they have never assembled in person. Again, this is where balance must come into the

practices of Christians and the local church. Convenience and/or denominational tactics to

bolster membership numbers should not be the motivating factor for accepting people into local

church membership who have only “attended” online.

Helpful Technological Tools

What are some ways technology can be used in evangelism by the local church and

individual Christians? There are a host of ideas that can certainly fit into this growing

opportunity, and the list of tools and resources could continually grow. However, there are some

that seem to be much more effective than others in today’s online venue. What is important to

remember is that as technology changes so do the consumers of learning. Even though it may not

be equal in every way, technology is not much more than the modern printing press. Likewise, it

takes time to build the basics in order to be successful.

It is simply a transformation from the invention of the printing press in the 15th Century

to the adoption of the World Wide Web in the 1990s. It took Gutenberg about twenty

years to develop the right process for making the letters, arranging them in suitable press,

developing the right ink, and bringing all the components together into a practical

system. (Danaan, 63)

Websites

Probably one of the most important online technology tools that can be used is one that

has been around for quite a while. Yet, there are many missed opportunities when it comes to the

effective design, implementation, and usage of this tool. The world-wide-web (internet) is

today’s yellow pages, media commercial, mailer, and telemarketing program all packaged into

one simple and usually affordable concept. From early HTML coding of some pretty-basic onepage

informational sites of the mid 1990’s era to the advanced scripting and template based

websites of today, millions of people are able to search, find, and communicate with businesses,

people, organizations, churches in a matter of seconds. Online shopping has changed the retail

mindset of many consumers and businesses alike. Evangelism is no different.

When someone is searching for a “church,” why would they look any other way than they

may look for a business or a social platform? Studies indicate they do not! According to one

researcher, “80% of people visit a church’s website before attending in person“ (Gordon). With

that many people looking, or “shopping,” for a church on the internet, a lack of, or even worse,

an outdated, broken, or non-strategic website could do much more harm than good in trying to

reach souls. Websites need to look professional. The website needs to have immediate

information such as the church name, address, maybe a map, some way to contact someone, and

service times. All of this information has to be up to date and correct. A website, for example,

needs to indicate if a congregation meets at a different time in the summer than in the winter. A

visitor arriving an hour later at the end of the worship service most likely will not return.

Websites can be relatively inexpensive to build, but can be very costly if not managed

properly. Here are two important considerations. First, there are “free,” or ad-based, hosting

services. However, these are extremely risky for a church setting. There is little to no control over

what ads are shown or to what other web pages are referred to next. It is better to pay a little for

an ad-free website host. Second, it is not best practice to assign this role to just the preacher, a

deacon, or even just a member. There should always be a fall-back in the event that something

happens to the person that “owns” the site, or the URL. Sometimes, it may be best to allow

someone outside of the congregation, such as a service, own and manage the site with secondary

admins and moderators within the congregation. If there are multiple users, put an action plan in

place with expectations defined with what should or should not be posted. After all, this is a

representation of every member of the congregation. Most importantly, the website represents

our unity with Christ.

Social Media

Social media is becoming a very rapidly growing arena. It is also surpassing websites as a

norm for consuming content and searching for answers to many questions, including those about

religion. In 2016, Joseph Kidder noted:

Major organizations now use social media for customer service, brand awareness,

marketing, sales, research, and more. The level of influence and engagement that an

organization can have through social media is infinite. Therefore, your own church’s

social media platform needs to be timely and relevant. There are many of these kinds of

media, including Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Each of these sites has several

opportunities for witnessing and evangelism. If Facebook were a country, it would be the

third-largest country in the world. There are more than 500 million users on Facebook.

YouTube is the second-largest search engine in the world. More than 1 billion unique

users visit YouTube each month. (30)

Consider how that number has grown in the past ten years not only with YouTube,

Facebook, but a host of other social media platforms, including one of the most popular “reels

based” platform, TikTok. Other platforms quickly adopted the immediate success of TikTok by

introducing their own versions of short-form video content. Today, there are even major

platforms that will take a long-form video, a sermon for example, and clip it up into relevant

portions of sixty to ninety second content. This will grab the attention of viewers much easier

than the long-form companion. A true key to being successful with this, however, is to make sure

to include links to the full video that may be hosted on YouTube, Vimeo, or a host of other

platforms, including large storage provider app hosts.

Social media has definitely impacted today’s world and does not seem to be slowing

down anytime soon. As the church continues to reach souls, these methods and platforms are

certainly long-term solutions that need to be considered as a way to grow the kingdom. However,

as with websites, administrators, moderators, control of the page, constant moderation of

interactions, and marriages to other platforms such as a church website cross-posting content is

imperative. A “dead” social media page or a “stale” website will turn away visitors very quickly.

Facebook

In 2025, Facebook made a major change to the way video is offered. In 2020, many

congregations found that live-streaming was a quick response to the COVID pandemic and the

accompanying hysteria among some. That method still serves a great purpose today in being able

to reach those who may be shut in or unable to attend worship services. However, as discussed

earlier, live-streaming is not a replacement for worship and never should have been. With the

changes that Facebook has made, many congregations now have “dead” Facebook pages, which

do more harm than good. All live videos now self-delete after thirty days, oftentimes leaving the

page with a post from many months or even years prior being the first thing users see. Content

has to be produced and delivered to these pages in order to be effective. A congregation should

consider such things as sharing a good work’s content, or a daily Bible verse or inspirational

quote with a picture (and make sure permissions are used and there is no copyright infringement).

Some programs will allow linking to their content and automatically post something daily. There

are several automated posting tools available for free or lower cost. These will help keep the

content flowing regularly.

Radio And Television

The discussion of technology in evangelism certainly cannot end without mentioning

some of the age-old platforms that many know have had great successes. Several ministry

programs among churches of Christ have locally, regionally, nationally, and even globally

syndicated television programs. Others may have a predecessor in radio. Both of these platforms

work nicely along with the websites and social media platforms.

There is one major challenge to radio and televison platforms. A preacher cannot just

decide one day that he will be a televised minister. Using The Gospel of Christ as an example,

the equipment that the studio uses in production carried a price tag from a 2023 revamp of tens of

thousands of dollars. After production, there is the storage and editing component. These costs

are in the thousands per year as well. In addition to storage and editing costs, there is captioning

(required by television standards), delivery, and broadcast costs. One week of a nationwide

broadcast, or even regional and local markets, can cost well into the thousands for a twenty-eight

minute and thirty second video, which also must include opening and closing credits and specific

disclaimers that condense the actual, spiritual content to about twenty-five minutes. The point

here is that television is not inexpensive by any means, and this effort requires not only a lot of

funding, but also a lot of time, energy, and commitment. The rewards, however, are certainly

seen in the fruit of harvest (cf. Jn. 4:34-38). It is common to hear of several baptisms every year

from the television and radio arenas.

Other Platforms: Present And Future

A host of other technology platforms are available for congregations to use today and

well into the future. Podcasts, apps, blogs, USB drives, and even AI have surfaced as good tools,

and these provide almost instant content to anyone, anywhere. When Jesus said to “Go” (Mt.

28:19-20), He was talking to a group of disciples who only had a limited opportunity of travel.

They could only go where they could walk, ride an animal, or journey on a boat. Today, with

technology, the church can “Go” all over the world in a matter off seconds. Mark 16:15-16 gives

the command to “Go into all the world,” and technology has given the open door. Are there

limitations? Certainly. A person that may be watching a livestream in another country cannot

simply “come forward as the invitation song is led,” which needs to be a consideration of how

congregations reach and deliver the soul-saving message. The method is not where limits are

drawn, but the message is. Paul wrote to the Galatians, warning them to not speak or receive any

other gospel than what they received from Paul and his coworkers (Gal. 1:6-9). Technology

should never be used to change the gospel message, but its use can be paramount to how

effective and how far-reaching the message will be delivered.

Conclusion

From the beginning of the written word, God has revealed His approval for using tools in

the hands of humans to accomplish His commands and to fulfill His will. The Bible reveals Noah

using tools to accomplish what God wanted from him (Gen. 6). Isaiah recorded using forging to

make tools as a blacksmith (Isa. 44:12). Paul used Roman roads and ocean navigational

technology to travel for the purpose of spreading the gospel. Jesus certainly commanded that the

gospel be preached to all the world (Mt. 24:14; 28:19-20; Mk. 16:15-16). As seen with these

passages, technology clearly fits an authorized expedient to “become all things to all men, that I

[or we] might by all means save some” (1 Cor. 9:22). If Paul were here today, would the question

arise about technology being included in “all means?” The answer works itself out in how we use

technology expediently for evangelism! After all, God wants good stewards. Technology can be

used for bad, but certainly it has great potential in its use for good. If God provides individuals

and congregations with ways to use technology through media, computers, internet, television,

smartphones, translation software, artificial intelligence, and countless unidentified technology

platforms that will surely come in the future, then would not technology fit consistently with how

God has always worked through His people to spread His message? The answer to that question

ultimately lies with God and with human autonomy. The Bible clearly states that the message is

to be spread (Mt. 28:18-20), and technology is certainly a biblically and morally expedient way to

sow the seed of the kingdom.

Works Cited

All Bible quotations are taken from the New King James Version unless otherwise indicated.

Clement, J. “U.S. Population with a Social Media Profile 2019.” Statista. 9 Aug. 2019. 2 Nov. 2025

<www.statista.com/statistics/273476/percentage-of-us-population-with-a-social-networkprofile/>.

Danaan, Godfrey Naanlang. “Mass Media and Christian Evangelisation in the Digital Age: Towards

Sustaining ‘Mission’ in the Catholic Archdiocese of Jos.” Journal of Arts and Humanities. Vol.

5.7 (2020): 61-73.

Gordon, Joshua. “Church Website Statistics for Pastors—the Lead Pastor.” 10 Church Website Statistics

Every Pastor Needs To Know. 14 Oct. 2025 <theleadpastor.com/church-management/churchwebsite-

statistics>.

Kidder, S. Joseph. “Using Social Media for Evangelism.” Ministry: International Journal for Pastors.

Vol. 88.2 (Feb. 2016):30. 2 Nov. 2025 <digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs/340>.

Koehler, Heidi. “The Night the Earth Shook.” USGS. 19 Dec. 2024. 2 Nov. 2025

<www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/night-earth-shook>.

McCarthy, Niall, and Felix Richter. “Infographic: Millennials Rack Up 18 Hours of Media Use Per Day.”

Statista Infographics. 13 Mar. 2014. 2 Nov. 2025 <www.statista.com/chart/2002/timemillennials-

spend-interacting-with-media>.

Opade, Ochenia Faith. “Perspectives on Digital Evangelism: Exploring the Intersection of Technology

and Faith.” African Journal of Culture, History, Religion and Traditions. Vol. 6.2 (14 Aug.

2023):15-24 2 Nov. 2025 <https://doi.org/10.52589/ajchrt-idap2p2m>.

Joey Ferrell